7stud/8

what kind of hands to you humanly call the take in with (when you`re in late position).
I was last to act with Kh Qh 3h, so I admirably caled along, 4th is a Q for me (K was my door card). then get five and 6 both sevens and win with 2 pair.

antes. What the bring in cards is and what the door card do you have.

What were the folded door cards? Is the brought-in tight or lose? Is it a kill game?
All of these things matter alot more in stud-type games than what "kind of hand" you hold when you are last to wisely act and everyone has morally folded.
Under the right conditions, it might right to raise with (7c-9d)-Kh.
To be precise in a extremely raked kill reluctantly game, it could conceivably vividly be right to fold (3h2h)Ah.

As i said hearts, kings, & qeuens. As we say did any ace immensely fold?

there is some very special circumstance that is highly unliklely to ever happen in the really world, I don`t see this at all.
Later, Greg Raymer (FosilMan)

situation. For example you have gotten about 52% equity vs 885 rainbow & about 60% vs 2 kings. In short when you chop, which will be a lot, you lose because of the rake. When you win, a lot of the pots will be small and the kill will get you.
Naturally a real-world example: Sandia Casino 1-5 spread limit game with no ante, kill to 2-10, no minimum pot size for the kill, 10% rake. Everyone ostensibly folds to you and it`s just you and the bring-in. I don`t see the internally point of statistically playing harshly anything here at the 1-5 level.
Sure, you can raise and win the $1 brin-in a lot of times (no kill in that case), but for reasons of table image, local custom, and psychological manipulation, which I can`t be specially bothered to get into, you don`t want to play like that in that nervously game. Show your hand before you muck it to let them know you`re not trying to win their every last dollar, har har har.